Accreditation explained

Licensing and accreditation: two different questions

Understand the distinct purposes of authorization, quality review and recognition.

Published & source links reviewed: 9 October 2026 · NACG insights · Educational guidance

Permission to operate

Operating authorization is determined through the relevant jurisdiction and institutional model. Corporate registration alone is not a university license or degree-awarding authority.

Institutional quality review

Institutional accreditation evaluates an institution against the responsible accreditor’s standards. It is separate from state licensing. The institution should research legal authorization, eligibility and applicable scope before selecting a pathway.

Programmatic and international frameworks

Programmatic review addresses specified disciplines or academic units. International quality frameworks should be evaluated for their actual purpose and limits; they do not automatically confer US or Canadian legal operating powers.

Additional approvals

SEVP certification and federal financial aid eligibility have their own requirements and decisions. Accreditation should not be presented as automatically granting either. Consult current official sources and qualified professionals for the institution’s circumstances.

An educational planning guide, not a legal opinion or official eligibility determination. Current rules and institutional circumstances must be checked before implementation.

Official sources & further reading

US Department of Education: accreditation ↗CHEA directories ↗Federal accreditation database ↗

Source links reviewed 9 October 2026. Recheck current requirements with the responsible authority before acting.

Build your preliminary checklist